1. Yamani N, Yousefy A, Changiz T. Proposing a participatory model of teacher evaluation. Iran J Med Educ. 2006;6(2):115-22. [Persian] [ Homepage] 2. Raoofi Sh, Sheikhian A, Ebrahimzade F, Tarahi MG, Ahmadi P. Designing a novel sheet to evaluate theoretical teaching quality of faculty members based on viewpoints of stakeholders and Charles E. Glassick\\\'s scholarship principles. Hormozgan Med J. 2010;14(3):167-76. [Persian] [ Homepage] 3. Ziaie M, Mirie M, Haji Abadi MR, Mehrijoofard H. Evaluation of faculty Members by Students in Birjand University of Medicine. J Med Educ. 2005;8(1):17-25. [ Homepage] 4. Tazakori Z, Akherbeen K, Abedi A, Mowla\\\'ii B. Correlation between four forms of academic evaluation at medical university. J Health Care. 2008;10(4):13-8. [Persian] 5. Gholami Kh, Asady M. The Professors’s professional experience in relation to effective teaching phenomen in higher education. J Theory Pract Curric. 2013;1(2):5-26. [Persian]. [ Homepage] 6. Kerman Saravi F, Navidian A, Navabi Sh. Nursing faculty and students views on priorities for the evaluation of teachers. Iran J Nurs. 2011;24(72):18-28. [Persian] [ Homepage] 7. Heidari H, Sharifirad GhR, Kamran A. A comparative study of teacher evaluation priorities from viewpoint of the faculty members and students of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. Health Sys Res. 2013;9(7):749-59. [Persian] [ Homepage] 8. Gashmard R, Moatamed N, Vahedparast H. Faculty members\\\' and students’ veiwpoints on characteristics of a good university teacher in Boushehr University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(1):47-58. [Persian] [ Homepage] 9. Zohoor AR, Eslaminejad T. Indicators of effective teaching from the view of students. Payesh. 2002;1(4):5-13. [Persian] [ Homepage] 10. Salehi Sh, Hassan Zahrayi R, Ghazavi Z, Amini P, Ziaei Sh. The characteristics of effective clinical teachers as perceived by nursing faculty and students. Iran J Med Educ. 2004;4(1):37-44. [Persian] [ Homepage] 11. Pritchard RE, Potter GC. Adverse changes in faculty behavior resulting from use of student evaluations of teaching: A case study. J Coll Teach Learn. 2011;8(1):1-7. [ Homepage] 12. Agbetsiafa D. Evaluating effective teaching in college level economics using student ratings of instruction: A factor analytic approach. J Coll Teach Learn. 2010;7(5):57-66. [ Homepage] 13. Devlin M, Samarawickrema G. The Criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. High Educ Res Dev. 2010;29(2):111-24. [ DOI] 14. Zabaleta F. The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teach High Educ. 2007;12(1):55-76. [ DOI] 15. Onwuegbuzie AJ. Students’ perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A validity study of a teaching evaluation form using a mixed-methods analysis. Am Educ Res J. 2007;44(1):113-60. [ Homepage] 16. Buskist W. Effective Teaching: Perspectives and Insights from Division Two\\\'s 2- and 4-Year Awardees. Teach Psychol. 2002;29(3):188-93. [ DOI] 17. Tale’pasand S, Nazifi M, Bigdeli I. Validation of the Iranian version of the questionnaire to assess the quality of teaching students. J Behav Sci. 2009;3(2):113-27. [Persian] [ Homepage] 18. Coffey M, Gibbs G. The evaluation of the student evaluation of educational quality questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK higher education. Assess Eval High Educ. 2001;26(1):89-93. [ DOI] 19. Marsh H, Roche L. The use of student evaluations of university teaching in different settings the applicability paradigm. Aust J Educ. 1992;36(3):278-300. [ Homepage] 20. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Chung CM, Siu TLP. Students evaluations of university teaching: Chinese version of the Student\\\'s Evaluations of Educational Quality (SEEQ) Instrument. J Educ Psychol. 1997;89:568-72. 21. Marsh HW. A longitudinal perspective of student\\\'s evaluations of university teaching: Rating of the same Teachers over a 13 year period. San Francisco, CA: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; April 20-24, 1992. [ Homepage] 22. Fatahi Z, Ohami A, Nohi E, Nakhaei N. Kerman University of Medical Sciences faculty in terms of academic evaluation in 2002-2003. Hormozgan Med J. 2005;9(1):59-66. [Persian] 23. Ghorbani R, Haji-Aghajani S, Heidarifar M, Andade F, Shams-Abadi M. Viewpoints of nursing and para-medical students about the features of a good university lecturer. Koomesh. 2009;10(2):77-83.[Persian] [ Homepage] 24. Vakili A, Hajaghajani S, Rashidy-Pour A, Ghorbani R. An investigation of factors influencing student evaluation of teacher performance: A comprehensive study in Semnan university of medical sciences. Koomesh. 2011;12(2):93-103. [Persian] [ Homepage] 25. Nouhi E. Factors affecting faculty evaluation by students in Kerman University of Medical Sciences. J Med Educ. 2002;2(1):18-23. [Persian] [ Homepage] 26. Marsh HW. Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues and directions for future research. Int J Educ Res. 1987;11(3):253-388. [ Science Direct] 27. Sheehan DS. On the invalidity of student ratings for administrative personnel decisions. J High Educ. 1975;46(6):687-700. [ Homepage] 28. Fesharakinia A, Khazaee Z, Mohammadpoor M. Assessment of Birjand medical school students\\\' attitudes toward the criteria of academic evaluation in 2009. Mod Care J. 2012;9(1):49-56. [Persian] [ Homepage]
|