1. Reys RE, Lindquist M, Lindquist MM, Lambdin DV, Smith NL. Helping children learn mathematics: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. [ Homepage] 2. Karimi A, Bakhali-Zadeh Sh, Kabiri M. A Brief Report of the Main Results of the TIMSS & Pirls (2011) and its Comparison with the Performance of Students in the Periods Before. Research and Educational Planning Organization, Institute of Education Studies, Center for the Study of TIMSS & Pirls; 2012. [ Persian[ 3. Bessant KC. Factors associated with types of mathematics anxiety in college students. J RES MATH EDUC. 1995:327-345. 4. Yenilmez K, Girginer N, Uzun O, editors. Mathematics anxiety and attitude level of students of the faculty of economics and business administrator: The Turkey model. International Mathematical Forum; 2007. 5. Obidigbo GC. The relationship between Self-concept and Academic Performance of Nigerian students. Ife Psychologia. 2002;10(2):20-27. [ Homepage] 6. Naghsh Z, Moghadam A. A Comparison of Multi-Level Modeling and Single- Level Analysis Techniques and their Application to TIMSS 2007 Data Analysis. Educational Measurement. 2012;2(8):133-54. 7. Ahmadi Gh. MirMoini S. a comparative study on the effect of school management on achievement of students in 9th grade (Iran, America, Taiwan, Russia, Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong), Journal of Educational innovations, 2012;11(42):104-75. [ Homepage] 8. A. Levav-Waynberg and R. Leikin, Multiple solutions for a problem: a tool for evaluation of mathematical thinking in geometry, Proceedings of CERME 6, January 28th -February 1st 2009, Lyon, France, 2009, pp. 776-785. 9. Henningsen M, Stein MK. Mathematical Tasks and Student Cognition: Classroom-Based Factors That Support and Inhibit High-Level Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning. J RES MATH EDUC. 1997;28(5):524-49. [ Homepage] 10. Sief AA. Modern educational psychology (Psychology of Learning and Instruction), 6rd Ed, Tehran: Doran publisher. 2004, [In Persian[ 11. Fardanesh, H. Classification of constructivist design patterns based on learning and teaching approaches, Foundations of education (Studies in education & psychology). 2008;9(2). [in persian] 12. Levav-Waynberg A, Leikin R. The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 2012;31(1):73-90. 13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. 2000. 14. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (NGAC), Common core state standards for mathematics. 2010. 15. Schukajlow S, Krug A. Do multiple solutions matter? Prompting multiple solutions, interest, competence, and autonomy. J RES MATH EDUC. 2014;45(4):497-533. [ Homepage] 16. Wu HH. The role of Euclidean geometry in high school. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 1996;15(3):221-37. [ Homepage] 17. Leikin R. Multiple-solution tasks: from a teacher education course to teacher practice. ZDM. 2011;43(6):993-1006. [ Homepage] 18. Lynch K, Star JR. Views of struggling students on instruction incorporating multiple strategies in Algebra I: An exploratory study. JRME 2014;45(1):6-18. [ Homepage] 19. Adib hajbagheri M, Parvizi S, Salsali M. Qualitative research methods, [Persian] Tehran: boshra Publisher. 2012. [In Persian[ [ Homepage] 20. Palacios A, Arias V, Arias B. Attitudes Towards Mathematics: Construction and Validation of a Measurement Instrument//Las actitudes hacia las matemáticas: Construcción y validación de un instrumento para su medida. Revista de Psicodidáctica. 2013;19(1); 67-91. [ Homepage] 21. Mehrmohammadi M, Abedi L. The nature of teaching and its aesthetic qualities. Modaress human sciences. 2001;5(3)(Tome 20);43-58. [In Persian[ 22. Eisner EW. The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs and Preparing for the Praxis Exam - A Guide for Teachers Package: Pearson Education, 3rd Ed; 2002
|
