[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Principles of Transparency::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 4, Issue 1 (Spiring 2011) ::
Educ Strategy Med Sci 2011, 4(1): 27-30 Back to browse issues page
Principals and teachers’ attitude in relation with manipulating qualitative and quantitative evaluation in intended, implemented and experimented curriculum
Momeni Mahmuei H. 1, Teimuri S. , Sedaghat Farimani B.
1- , moameni_57@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (17657 Views)

    Aims: Evaluating the curriculums is one of the important activities in the education process that demonstrates success and efficacy and has various benefits. The main aim of the present study was to compare the intended, implemented and experiential curriculum evaluation by means of quantitative and qualitative evaluation from the viewpoint of schoolteachers and principals.

  Methods : This survey research was performed on two groups on schoolteachers and principals of Saleh-Abad who were employed during 2009-2010 academic year. The first group consisted of 35 primary school principals who were selected by census sampling method and the second group consisted of 285 schoolteachers who were selected by simple random sampling. Data was collected by a researcher-made questionnaire and was analyzed by descriptive analytical methods and independent t-test using SPSS 16 software.

  Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation in intended, implemented, and experiential curriculum evaluation.

  Conclusion: There is no significant difference between principals and teachers’ viewpoint about using quantitative and qualitative evaluation in intended, implemented and experiential curriculum evaluation. In other words, both groups agree on using qualitative and quantitative evaluation in curriculum evaluation.

Keywords: Curriculum Evaluation, Qualitative Evaluation, Quantitative Evaluation, Types of Curriculum
Full-Text [PDF 211 kb]   (5640 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Health
Received: 2011/01/8 | Accepted: 2011/07/23 | Published: 2011/04/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Momeni Mahmuei H., Teimuri S., Sedaghat Farimani B.. Principals and teachers’ attitude in relation with manipulating qualitative and quantitative evaluation in intended, implemented and experimented curriculum. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2011; 4 (1) :27-30
URL: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-113-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 1 (Spiring 2011) Back to browse issues page
دوماهنامه علمی- پژوهشی راهبــردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی Education Strategies in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645