[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 11, Issue 2 (May-June 2018) ::
Educ Strategy Med Sci 2018, 11(2): 97-105 Back to browse issues page
Students’ Standpoint about Qualitative Assessment of Performance of Faculty Members
Zohre Saneii
Department of Educational Sciences, Hasheminejad Paradise, University of Farhangian, Mashhad, Iran , zohresaneii@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract:   (654 Views)
Introduction: In every educational system, educators are one of the effective components in the learning process. Therefore survey the quality of their performance should be considered by educational planner to improve the universities. The goal of the present study is Students’ standpoint about qualitative assessment of performance of faculty members to inform them of their performance.
Methods: The total statistical population for the study consisted of 1159 students at Shahid Hasheminejad’s female campus of Farhangian University in the 2016-2017 academic year. The sampling method was random stratified based on the field of study of 288 participants. The data was gathered using a questionnaire, which consisted of questions on personal attributes, assessment of performance of faculty members and the method of questionnaire completion. The validity of the contents of the questionnaire was confirmed by seeking opinion of the experts and its reliability was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha (0.87) test. The needed data were collected by a questionnaire after confirming its validity and reliability. To analyze the data, statistical indices such as mean, standard deviation and Pearson correlation coefficient using Spss version 24 was used.
Results: Personality of faculty members with an average 68.71% and standard deviation of 0.97 is the most important and teaching method, and evaluation with an average 47.28% and standard deviation of 1.05 is the less important dimensions from students’ standpoint. No Significant correlation was observed between students’ standpoints and their GPA (p = 0.716 & r = 0.03).
Conclusions: According to the results, lecturers need mechanisms such as retraining and continuous instructions to improve the quality of teaching.
Keywords: Evaluation, Scientific Quality, Teaching Quality, Student, Lecturer
Full-Text [PDF 700 kb]   (174 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Research in Medical Science Education
Received: 2017/10/17 | Accepted: 2018/01/20 | Published: 2018/05/12
1. Rostamzadeh Z, Zareh Z, Homan K. The viewpoint of paramedical students' of Urmia University of Medical Sciences about the influential factors on teachers' evaluation. Future Med Educ J. 2013;3(3):41-6.
2. Torkzadeh J, Marzoghi R, Mohamadi M, Mohtaram M. [Influencing Factors on Students' Evaluation of Faculties at Shiraz University]. Educ Meas Eval Stud. 2014;4(7):139-64.
3. Shakunia A, Amin M, Taherzadeh M. [A comparison of teachers' evaluation scores by students and alumni of Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in 2011]. J Med Educ Dev. 2013;8(3):2-12.
4. Stone JE. Inflated grades, inflated enrollment, and inflated budgets: An analysis and call for review at the state level. Educ Pol Anal Arch. 1995;3(11):1-33.
5. Bastani P, Amin M, Tahernejad A, Rouhollahi N. [The Tehran University of Medical Sciences Faculty Members'Viewpoints about the Teachers' Evaluation System: AQualitative Study]. J Torbat Heydariyeh Univ Med Sci. 2014;2(1):7-16.
6. Seif A. [Educational measurement, assessment and evaluation]. 6th ed. Tehran: Doran; 2007.
7. Dargahi H, Movahedkor E, Shaham G. [ A Survey of faculty members and lecturers approach about teaching evaluation procedure by EDC questionnaire in School of Allied Health Sciences, TehranUniversity of Medical Sciences]. Payavard. 2009;3(1-2):75-84.
8. Shakurnia A, Torabpour M, Elhampour H. [Correlation between student evaluation of teaching and students' grades]. Iranian J Med Educ. 2006;6(1):51-8.
9. Rahimi M, Zarooj Hosseini R, Darabian M, Taherian A, Khosravi A. [Teacher Evaluation by Students: A Comprehensive Approach]. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2012;9(1):34-45.
10. Charkazi A, Badeleh M, Hosseini S, Rouhi G, Sanagoo A, Jafari S. [The Viewpoint of Students about The Influential Factors of Teacher's Performance in Theoretical Courses in Golestan University of Medical Sciences' Students]. J Res Dev Nurs Midwifery. 2013;9(2):56-64.
11. Aghamolayi T, Abedini S. [Comparison of Self and Students' Evaluation of Faculty Members in School of Health of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences]. Iran J Med Educ. 2008;7(2):191-9.
12. Aghaali M, Safaeipour R. [An Assessment of Some Effective Factors on Faculty members Evaluation Score by Medical Students in Qom]. J Med Educ Dev. 2016;8(20):1-8.
13. Ranjbar M, Vahidshahi K, Mahmoudi M. [Viewpoints of the attendings and medical students about the Students' evaluation of the attendings, Mazandaran]. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2007;16(56):126-35.
14. Mahmoudi Sahebi M, Nasri S, Gholinia Gholzom H. [Identifying Criteria for Evaluating Teaching Performance of Faculty Members with Emphasizing on Engineering Teaching]. J Technol Educ. 2013;7(4):315-24.
15. Ghorbani R, Haji-Aghajani S, Heidarifar M, Andade F, Shams-Abadi M. [Viewpoints of nursing and para-medical students about the features of a good university lecturer]. Koomesh. 2009;10(2):77-84.
16. Peyman H, Zarian A, Sadeghifar J, Alizadeh M, Yaghubi M, Yamani N, et al. [Characteristics of a Capable University Teacher from the Students' Point of View]. Iranian J Med Educ. 2011;10(5).
17. Aghamolaei T, Javadpour S, Abedini S. [Attitude of Bandar-Abbas medical university faculty members about their assessment by the scholars]. Bimonthly J Hormozgan Univ Med Sci. 2010;14(3):234-40.
18. Vahabi A, Rahmani S, Rostami S, Vahabi B, Hosseini M, Roshani D. [Factors affecting teacher evaluation scores: the studentsviewpoints of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences]. Iranian J Med Educ. 2015;15:111-21.
19. Ali HIH, Ajmi AASA. Exploring Non-Instructional Factors in Student Evaluations. Hi Educ Stud. 2013;3(5).
20. Amini N, Zamani B, Abedini Y. [Comparison of Educational Media Applied by Professors of Medical Science, Technical Engineering, and Human Science Colleges in Teaching-learning Process form Students' Viewpoint]. Train Learn Res. 2014;2(4):55-70.
21. Sun D. An Analysis of Questionnaire Survey on Online Evaluation of Teaching by University Undergraduates. Hi Educ Stud. 2013;3(6).
22. Abedini S, Kamalzadeh H, Aghamolaei T. [Perspectives of medical students regarding criteria for a good university professor, Bandar Abbas, Iran]. Bimonthly J Hormozgan Univ Med Sci. 2010;14(3):241-5.
23. Aliasgharpour M, Monjamed Z, Bahrani N. [Factors affecting students' evaluation of teachers: Comparing viewpoints of teachers and students]. Iranian J Med Educ. 2010;10(2):186-95.
24. Asghari N, Hosseini Teshnizi S, Abedini S, Razmara A, Naderi N. [Comparative evaluation of teaching by scholar and teacher self-assessment]. Bimonthly J Hormozgan Univ Med Sci. 2010;14(3):246-53.
25. Afshar M, Hasanzadeh Taheri M, Ryasi H, Naseri M. [Evaluation of faculty members by students with different educational development]. J Birjand Univ Med Sci. 2010;17(2):118-26.
26. Motlagh M, Shakournia A, Elhampour H. [Correlation between students GPA and evaluation score of teacher]. Iranian J Med Educ. 2002;2(0):40-1.
27. Thawabieh AM. Students Evaluation of Faculty. Int Educ Stud. 2017;10(2):35. [DOI:10.5539/ies.v10n2p35]
28. Mau RR, Opengart RA. Comparing Ratings: In-class (paper) vs. Out of Class (online) Student Evaluations. Hi Educ Stud. 2012;2(3).
29. Amini M, Honardar M. [The view of faculties and medical students about evaluation of faculty teaching experiences]. Koomesh. 2008;9(3):171-8.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Saneii Z. Students’ Standpoint about Qualitative Assessment of Performance of Faculty Members. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2018; 11 (2) :97-105
URL: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-1365-en.html

Volume 11, Issue 2 (May-June 2018) Back to browse issues page
دوماهنامه علمی- پژوهشی راهبــردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی Education Strategies in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3855