1. Neo M, Neo KTK, Lim T-L, Tan HY-J, Kwok W-J. Instructional Relationships within a Web-based Learning Environment: Students' Perceptions in a Malaysian Classroom. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2013;103:515-25. [ DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.368] 2. Derakhshande M. [An evaluation of the student satisfaction of MA university e-learning system based on Kano model] [dissertation]. Malaysia: Mehr Alborz Virtual University; 2011. 3. Lee YJ, Lee D. Factors influencing learning satisfaction of migrant workers in Korea with e-learning-based occupational safety and health education. Saf Health Work. 2015;6(3):211-7. [ DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2015.05.002] [ PMID] [ PMCID] 4. Chiu YL, Tsai CC, Fan Chiang CY. The relationships among nurses' job characteristics and attitudes toward web-based continuing learning. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(4):327-33. [ DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.011] [ PMID] 5. Okhovati M, Sharifpoor Ghahestani E, Islami Nejad T, Hamzezadeh Marzooni M, Motamed Jahroomi M. [Attitude, knowledge and skill of medical students toward E-Learning; Kerman University of Medical Sciences]. Bimonthly Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2015;8(1):51-8. 6. Kamkar P, Nili Ahmadabadi M. [Factor Structure Questionnaire Questionnaire and its review at Universities of Tehran E-Learning]. ICTEDU 2013;1(4):105-28. 7. Hasanzadeh M. [Electronic learning]. Tehran: Tadbir Publication; 2002. 8. Trepka MJ, Newman FL, Davila EP, Matthew KJ, Dixon Z, Huffman FG. Randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of an interactive multimedia food safety education program for clients of the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108(6):978-84. [ DOI:10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.011] [ PMID] 9. Ghasemi Z, Falahabed P, Samieirad F. [Application electronic learning in medicine science: Multimedia project in Ghazvin university 2009]. Mashhad: Ofogh Publication; 2009. 10. Loutfy M. [analyzing the Satisfaction Rate of Clinical Education System in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences with 360 Degree Evaluation Approach]. Iran Univ Med Sci J. 2013;20(14). 11. Yengin I, Karahocab A, Karahoca D. E-Learning success model for instructors satisfactions in perspective of interaction and usability outcomes: Elsevier; 2010. 12. Bhuasiri W, Xaymoungkhoun O, Zo H, Rho JJ, Ciganek AP. Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Comp Educ. 2012;58(2):843-55. [ DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010] 13. Tseng A. Why do online tourists need sellers' ratings? Exploration of the factors affecting regretful tourist e-satisfaction. Tour Manage. 2017;59:413-24. [ DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.08.017] 14. Hong J-C, Tai K-H, Hwang M-Y, Kuo Y-C, Chen J-S. Internet cognitive failure relevant to users' satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use a government e-learning system. Comp Hum Behav. 2017;66:353-62. [ DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.044] 15. Harrati N, Bouchrika I, Tari A, Ladjailia A. Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis. Comp Hum Behav. 2016;61:463-71. [ DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.051] 16. Asoodar M, Vaezi S, Izanloo B. Framework to improve e-learner satisfaction and further strengthen e-learning implementation. Comp Hum Behav. 2016;63:704-16. [ DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.060] 17. Wu H-C, Ai C-H. Synthesizing the effects of experiential quality, excitement, equity, experiential satisfaction on experiential loyalty for the golf industry: The case of Hainan Island. J Hosp Tour Manage. 2016;29:41-59. [ DOI:10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.05.005] 18. Sanayhaei A, Shahin A. [Governance of Internal Marketing Components and its Impact on Quality of Service Development in Afshar Hospital, Yazd]. SRBIAU. 2012;0(0):99-108. 19. Najafizadeh N, Mojoodi A, Ghasemi P. [A Model for Identifying Service Quality Dimensions in Technological Banking Based on Students' Viewpoints (Case Study: Islamic Azad University - Arak Branch)]. SRBIAU. 2013;0(0):15-32. 20. Nayebzadeh S. [Comparison of market orientation in private and public banks and its impact on the quality of banking services (Case study: Yazd city)]. SRBIAU. 2013;0(0):147-66. 21. Azizi S. Evaluating the quality of electronic service. IT Mag. 2016;2(17):46-8. 22. Hasangholipour T, Esfidani M, Sajedifar A, Mohammadi A. [Effect of Quality of Electronic Services on Creating Trust and Satisfaction of Customers in the Financial Services Industry: A Study of Brokerage Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange]. IRLAW. 2012:57-78. 23. Hajikarimi A, Hamidizadeh M, Mansouri T. Review and analyze the perceived justice effects on customer behavior patterns and perceived service quality. R T M. 2013;1(5):1-27. 24. Frazer A. Quality in Higher Education: An international perspective. In D. Green, What is quality in Higher Education? Buckingham: O Up; 1994. 25. Harvey L, Green D. Defining Quality. Asses Eval Hi Educ. 2006;18(1):9-34. [ DOI:10.1080/0260293930180102] 26. Haffar M, Al-Karaghouli W, Ghoneim A. An empirical investigation of the influence of organizational culture on individual readiness for change in Syrian manufacturing organizations. J Organ Change Manage. 2014;27(1):5-22. [ DOI:10.1108/JOCM-04-2012-0046] 27. Nistor N, Baltes B, Dascălu M, Mihăilă D, Smeaton G, Trăuşan-Matu Ş. Participation in virtual academic communities of practice under the influence of technology acceptance and community factors. A learning analytics application. Comp Hum Behav. 2014;34:339-44. [ DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.051] |
