[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Principles of Transparency::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 10, Issue 2 (May-June 2017) ::
Educ Strategy Med Sci 2017, 10(2): 133-140 Back to browse issues page
The Assesment of Nursery and Midwifery Graduate Student Self Evaluation
MohammadReza Yousefzadeh Chosary
Department of Education, Faculity of Humanities, Buali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran , fuman47@gmail.com
Abstract:   (7008 Views)

Background and Aims: Self-assessment is the lost ring of all educational system and the most important tool of continuous improvement.this study aimed to evaluate the self assessment of different master degree students.

Methods: The study is a descriptive survey. The statistical pupulation (N=89) were included all graduate student of midwifery and nursury college student of hamedan medical university in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 academic year. Using ratio stratifed sampling method 73 students were selected as study sample. The data gathering instrument were student self-assessment researcher made questionnaire that its validity reported as acceptable by experts and its reliability using alpha cronbach coefficient computed equal to./83. To analyze the data, descriptive statistics and t-test and Friedman rank test was used.

Results: Research findings showed that the self-assessment components are self initiation,self independent, responsibility, self monitoring and self reporting .The students self-assessment components average were as following: Self-initiated (3/12), responsibility (3/55), independence (3/87), self-monitoring (3/02) and self report (4/12) and the Total average of Self-assessment were(3/53) and there was no significant difference between girl and boys student amount of self evaluation.

Conclusion: In order to internalize and improve student self assessment, it is recommended to provide appropriate mechanisms to encourage teachers to use interactive and non-interventional teaching styles in the process of teaching and learning.

Keywords: Self-Assessment, Components, Nursery Graduate Students
Full-Text [PDF 903 kb]   (2454 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Virtual Medical Education
Received: 2017/02/8 | Accepted: 2017/05/7 | Published: 2017/05/7
References
1. Barnabe F, Riccaboni A.which Role for Performance Measurement Systems in Higher Education? Focus on Quality Assurance in Italy. J stu educ. 2007; 33: 302–319. [Homepage]
2. Homaee R, Heidari A, Bakhtiarpoor S, Borna M. Relationship between achievement motivation, cognitive &emotional intelligence &nd demographical variable with student academic performance. Journal of new findings in psychology. 2009;4(12):49-63. [Persian]
3. Clipa O, Ignat AA, Rusu P. Relations of self-assessment accuracy with motivation level and metacognition abilities in pre-service teacher training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.2011; (30): 883-888. [Homepage]
4. Parpala AT, Lindblom YS, brown M, ball F, pendel bory D. University Teachers' Conceptions of Good Teaching in the Units of High-Quality Education. j. stu educ. 2007; (33): 355–370. [Homepage]
5. Mcmillan J, Hearn J. Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 2008: 87(1): 40-49. [Homepage]
6. School self evaluation guidelines post primary.2016; agus silkanna, Clarin College The Inspectorate Department of Education and Skills.
7. Balapumi, R. Aitken, A. Concept and factors influencing independent learning in is higher education. Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems;2014: 23 (1): 1-10. [Homepage]
8. Marshal G. “Promoting independent learning by curriculum design and assessment in a taught postgraduate MRI programmer”. The society and college of Radiographers.2012; (14): 238-245.
9. Rolheiser C, Ross JA. Student self evaluation: What research says and what practices shows. 2008; availableat: www.cdl.org, resources, library 9. Rolheiser C. Ross JA. Student self-evaluation: What research says and what practice shows. Plain talk about kids, 2001, 43: 57.‌
10. Sylvia M.R Assessing Fourth year Student-Teachers' understanding of Self-Evaluation Report Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.2014; (116): 3838-3842. [Homepage]
11. Chang CC, Tseng KH, Lou S.J. A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Comput Educ. 2012; (58): 303-320. [Homepage]
12. Cukusic M, Garaca Z, Jadric M.Online self-assessment and students’ success in higher education institutions. Comput Educ.2014; (72): 100-109. [Homepage]
13. Delaram M, Safdari F,Akbari N,Hosseini S,Rafee H.Comparison of last year midwifery student selevaluation of learned skills with their. hmj. 2015;17(3):273-281. [Persian]
14. Sadegi T,Abdoli F,Esmaeelzadeh Sh.the comparison of self evaluation and evaluation by educators of children training in rafsanjan medical university.jne.2016;5(3):25-31. [Persian]
15. Aminkhandaghi M,sapandar M,seyfi G h,Javadi M.The impact of studend continuous sel assessment on research self efficacy and academic achievement:A neglected elemen in curriculum design. journal of educational new thinking.2013;9(1):51-79. [Persian]
16. Zareei H., Maleki H., Sabzi Pour A.. Role of self-evaluation in educational and learning process of students. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2012; 5 (2) :131-136. [Persian]
17. Weason RH. Peer and self assessment, Deatin learning futures. 2015; Deatin university. Available at: https:// www.deakin.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0020/53462/peer-and-self-assessment.pdf
18. Lane KL, Royer DJ messenger ML common E A, ennis R.P swagger ED. Empowering teacher with low intensity strategy to support academic engagement. Educ Treat Children. 2015; 98(3):504-573.
19. Zumbrunn S, Tadlock J, Roberts ED. Encouraging self regulating learning in the classroom: A review of the literature, Metropolitian educational research consortium. 2012; virginia common wealth university. Available at: http:// www. self-regulation. ca/uploads/ 5/6/2/6/56264915 [Homepage]
20. Zheng H, Huang J, Chen Y. Effects of self-assessment Training on Chinese students' Performance on College English Writing teste polyglossia. Polyglossia. 2012; 23 (2):33-42. [Homepage]
21. Kolberlau D.R The Effects of Self-Assessment on Student Learning. 2006;A report on an action research project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for participation in the Math in the Middle Institute Partnership and the MAT degree. Available at: http:// digitalcommons.unl.edu/ cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=mathmidactionresearch
22. Mogonea F. Portfolio-Tool for self Evaluation of Students-Future Teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015; 180 860 – 864. available at:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yousefzadeh Chosary M. The Assesment of Nursery and Midwifery Graduate Student Self Evaluation. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2017; 10 (2) :133-140
URL: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-1165-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 2 (May-June 2017) Back to browse issues page
دوماهنامه علمی- پژوهشی راهبــردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی Education Strategies in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645