Introduction: this study was conducted to compare the viewpoints of faculty members and students about the quality of the use of coaching method in educational activities of faculty members of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This study was conducted in a descriptive-survey method. The statistical population included all faculty members and students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in the academic year of 97-96. The sample size was estimated using simple random sampling method, 257 professors and 361 students. Data gathering tools included: 1.The questionnaire of 34 questionnaires was used for teaching professors with a coefficient of reliability of 0.915 and 2. The questionnaire was 33 questions of student coaching method with a reliability coefficient of 0.935. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by the faculty members. The collected data were analyzed using independent t-test and one way analysis of variance. Results: Findings show that there is a significant difference between the views of faculty members and students regarding the quality of coaching method. In terms of the components and characteristics of the subject, students and professors had a mean and standard deviation (6.38 ± 6.9, 36.87 ± 6.71), respectively, and in terms of the characteristics and characteristics of the trainer, respectively, from the viewpoint of the professors and Students with mean and standard deviation (25.22 ± 5.34, 27.83 ± 3.93) and in the component of organizational requirements and conditions, were from the viewpoint of faculty members and students with mean and standard deviation (21.24 ± 5.55) 24, 30.44 ± 5.05) There is a difference between the views of the professors and the students. Conclusion: Based on the findings, it can be concluded that faculty members have a more favorable view toward students than their coaching methods.
tahmasebzadeh D, jafari K. Compare the viewpoints of faculty members and students about the quality of the use of coaching method in educational activities of faculty members. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2019; 12 (2) :18-25 URL: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-1555-en.html