[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims & Scopes
Editorial Board
Indexing
Archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Author's Guide
Reference Guide
Submit an Article
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Guide
Principles of Transparency::
Publication Ethics Statement
Research Ethics Statement
Open Access Statement
Copyright
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 1 (March-April 2016) ::
Educ Strategy Med Sci 2016, 9(1): 42-62 Back to browse issues page
Designing and validation of a scale to assess the quality of universities in Iran
Mohammad Mojtabazadeh1 , Abbas Abbaspour 2, Hasan Maleki3 , Maghsood Farasatkhah4 , Hamid Rahimian1
1- Department of Management and Educational Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Management and Educational Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran , abbaspour@atu.ac.ir
3- Department of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Department of Planning in Higher Education, the Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (10622 Views)

Aims: The present study was conducted to design and validate a scale for assessing the quality of universities in Iran.
Methods: this study was performed using a mixed method of explorative plan-tool development model. First, in qualitative part of this study, questionnaire consisted of 25 components and 157 sub-components were designed by using the method of Grounded Theory and interview with 36 experts. Then, in the quantitative section, designed questionnaires were conducted on 84 members of Iranian experts with high education. Based on the received feedback, the questionnaires were revised, then the final and modified version was put in the hands of 293 experts in different cities of Iran. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts and its reliability was calculated by Cronbach's alpha which was equal to (0/982). Non-probability purposive sampling method was used in the qualitative part of the study whereas random classified sampling method was applied in the quantitative part. In addition, analysis of structural equation modeling was used for testing mentioned scale
Results: By doing confirmatory factor analysis, mentioned scale tools were modified to 22 components and 150 sub-components. Results of second-order confirmatory factor analysis, also showed that 22 extracted components are sufficient factor leading to prediction scale related to accreditation and quality assurance of high education systems in Iran. In addition, goodness of fit indices such as, (CMIN/DF) which is equal to 1/924, (RMSEA) = 0/39, (GFI) equal= 0/976, (AGFI) = 0/939, (CFI) = 0/928, (NNFI) = 0/935, (TLI) = 1/000, (IFI) = 0/928 and (RFI) = 0925.
Conclusion: The results of statistical tests displayed that the designed scale enjoys very favorable fitness for the quality assessment of high education system in universities of Iran. 
Keywords: High education, Grounded theory, Structural equation modeling
Full-Text [PDF 983 kb]   (4861 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Health
Received: 2016/02/21 | Accepted: 2016/04/11 | Published: 2016/06/7
References
1. Vlăsceanu L, Grünberg L and Părlea D. Quality assurance and accreditation: a glossary of basic terms and definitions. 2nd ed. Bucharest: UNESCO‐CEPES Publishers; 2007. [File]
2. CHEA. An overview of U.S. accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.chea.org, 2016.
3. APA. Definition of accreditation. Retrieved from http://search.apa.org, 2016.
4. Farasatkhah M. Iranian University and the issue of quality. Tehran: Aghah Publishers; 2010. [Persian].
5. Bazargan, A. Educational evaluation. Tehran: Samt Publishers; 2013. [Persian].
6. Radcliffe, J. Measurement, assessment and accreditation in America. Translated by Gholamreza Yadegarzadeh. J Sci Fut. 2005;(7)99-113. [Persian].
7. WASC-ACSCU. WASC 2013 handbook of accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.wascsenior.org, 2016.
8. Everest College. How our accreditation benefits you. Retrieved from http://www.everestonline.edu, 2016
9. CITA. Benefits of accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.citaschools.org, 2016.
10. Farasatkhah M. Iranian University and the issue of quality. Tehran: Aghah Publishers; 2010. [Persian].
11. Maleki H. Islamic education, macro-oriented approach. Tehran: Aghah Publishers; 2011. [Persian].
12. Morin E & et al. Complex ideas and learning in the age of the planet. Translated by Mohammad Yamani, Tehran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies Publishers; 2009. [Persian].
13. Abili Kh. Evaluation of monitoring nature and current assessment in iran's higher education. Proceedings of the first seminar on higher education in Iran. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba'i Uni Press; 1997; (2). P. 331-345. [Persian].
14. Bazargan, A. Internal evaluation of university and its application on the continuous improvement in higher education quality. J Res Plan Hig Edu. 1995;3(3&4):49-70. [Persian].
15. Bazargan, A. Quality and its evaluation in higher education: Take a look at national and international experiences. J Rahyaft. 1997;(155):60-70. [Persian].
16. Abbaspour A. In search of adaptive model based on the Seerah for strategic development in the education system of Iran. Tehran: CGPIE, 2006. [Persian].
17. Farasatkhah M. University and higher education. Tehran: Ney Publishers; 2011. [Persian].
18. Delavare A. The basics of theoretical and practical research in the humanities and social sciences. Tehran: Roshd Publishers; 2015. [Persian].
19. Creswell J.W. & Plano Clark V.L. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers; 2007.
20. Tashakkori A. & Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers; 1998.
21. Berg B. L. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Publishers; 2004. [File]
22. Creswell J. W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers; 2003. [File]
23. McMillan J. H. Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson Publishers; 2004. [Homepage]
24. Creswell J. W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers; 2003.
25. Yin R. K. Case study research: Design and methods 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers; 2003.
26. Creswell J. W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers; 2003.
27. Berg B. L. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Publishers; 2004.
28. Dillman D. A. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sonse Publishers; 2000.
29. Mohammadpour A. Meta method. Tehran: Jameh shenasan Publishers; 2011. [Persian].
30. Farasatkhah M. University and higher education. Tehran: Ney Publishers; 2011. [Persian].
31. Krejcie RV. & Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 1970;30,607-610.
32. Saif AA. Constructing measurement instruments for research variables in psychology and education. Tehran: Didar Publishers; 2012. [Persian].
33. Ghasemi V. Structural equation modeling with applications in social research using the Amos Graphic. Tehran: Jameh shenasan Publishers; 2013. [Persian].
34. Baghaiee Shiva N. Study and design of appropriate evaluation model for accreditation of the high schools of new system of secondary education. Master thesis, T Uni, Fac Psy & Edu, 1995. [Persian].
35. Mirza Mohammad MH. Study and design an appropriate model for internal evaluation of educational quality of energy ministry. Master thesis, T Uni, Fac Psy & Edu, 1997. [Persian].
36. Farzianpour F. Evaluation of educational and therapeutic services in training hospitals of medical universities located in Tehran based on accreditation model. PhD dissertation. TIAU, S & R Bran, 1998. [Persian].
37. Fathabadi J. Designing of appropriate model for internal evaluation to improve the educational quality of medical universities. Master thesis, T Uni, Fac Psy & Edu, 1999. [Persian].
38. Pazargadi M. A model for accreditation of universities and higher education institutions in the public and private sectors. PhD dissertation. TIAU, S & R Bran, 1998 [Persian].
39. Pazargadi M, peyravi H, Pourkhoshbakht Y, Alavi Majd H & Azizi F. Proposing an Accreditation Model for Medical Universities of Iran. Iranian Journal of Med Educ. 2001;1(4):26-35. [Persian].
40. Fallah S, Mehdinia S, Ghaemi G, Moienian K, Yaghmaian K. Internal evaluation from environmental health department of Damghan faculty of health, in Semnan university of medical sciences. koomesh. 2004;5(2):71-76. [Persian]. [Homepage]
41. Farzianpour F, Salmani Baroogh N, Parsa Yekta Z, Monjamed Z & Eshraghian M. Internal evaluation in Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Hayat. 2005;11(2&1):71-78. [Persian].
42. Rahmani R and Fathi Vajargah K. Quality evaluation in higher education. J Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2008;1(1):28-39. [Persian].
43. Keyzouri A, Hosseini M & Fallahi Khoshknab M. The impact of internal evaluation on improving the quality of education and research. J I Nurs Res. 2008;3(8&9):105-115. [Persian].
44. Nuorollah Nuori Wandy A & Bradaran M. The desirable indicators of the higher education system's internal evaluation elements from the perspective of graduate students of Ramin agricultural university. J Agr Aco & Axt. 2008;1(4):55-69. [Persian].
45. Asgari Nejad A & Khademolhusseini Beheshti S. Standards development for accreditation of the faculty of Humanities: Localization of existing accreditation models of other countries. Sanandaj: RCLHEDM. SIAU, 2011. [Persian].
46. Kianmehr M, Ajam Zybd H, Abbasnejad A, Hamzehei A, Moslem A, Moshari J, Minoian Haghighi M & Ahmadi R. Internal evaluation of department of Basic medical sciences in one of the universities of 3 type of medical sciences in 2010.J Horizon Med Sci. 2011;17(2):40-49. [Persian].
47. Abbaspour A & Sharafi M. Internal evaluation in department of management and educational planning of Allameh Tabatabai University.J Educ Measu. 2011;2(5):131-159. [Persian].
48. Dashti N, Einollahi N, Zare Bovani M & Abbasi S. Internal Evaluation Of Medical Laboratory Sciences Department Of Allied Health Sciences School, Tehran University Of Medical Sciences(2010). payavard. 2012;6(2):117-127. [Persian].
49. AAC. Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area (ESG). Retrieved from https://www.aq.ac.at, 2016.
50. Yamani Dozi Sorkhabi M. Quality in higher education. Tehran: Samt Publishers; 2012 [Persian]
51. CHEA. An Overview of U.S. accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.chea.org, 2016.
52. NUC. Manual of accreditation procedure for academic programmes in Nigerian universities. Retrieved from http://www.ssu.edu.ng, 2016.
53. Okojif JA. Assurance in Nigerian universities achievement and challenges. Retrieved from http://www.chea.org, 2016.
54. QAAP. The quality assurance and accreditation handbook for higher education in Egypt. Retrieved from http://www.tanta.edu.eg, 2016.
55. HECIP. Quality assurance manual for higher education in Pakistan. Retrieved from http://web.uettaxila.edu.pk, 2016.
56. World Bank. Widening access to quality higher education. Retrieved from http://www.apqn.org & http://portal.unesco.org, 2016.
57. NCAAA. Accreditation and Quality assurance Criteria. Retrieved from https://www.mohe.gov.sa, 2016.
58. NAAC. Criteria for assessment. Retrieved from http://www.naac.gov, 2016.
59. World Bank. Higher education in Afghanistan an emerging mountainscape. Retrieved from http://reliefweb.int, 2016.
60. Tsinidou M, Gerogiannis V & Fitsilis P. Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study. J Qual Assur Educ. 2010;18.(3):227-244 [File]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mojtabazadeh M, Abbaspour A, Maleki H, Farasatkhah M, Rahimian H. Designing and validation of a scale to assess the quality of universities in Iran. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2016; 9 (1) :42-62
URL: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-955-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 1 (March-April 2016) Back to browse issues page
دوماهنامه علمی- پژوهشی راهبــردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی Education Strategies in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645