[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Principles of Transparency::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 1 (March-April 2018) ::
Educ Strategy Med Sci 2018, 11(1): 22-29 Back to browse issues page
Satisfaction of Undergraduate Midwifery Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from Clinical Evaluation using LOGBOOK
Marzieh Asadilari1 , Zeinab Moshfeghy 2, Ferdos Mohammad Alian3 , Marzieh Shahpari3
1- Gerash University of Medical Sciences, Gerash, Iran
2- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , moshfeghiz@sums.ac.ir
3- Department of Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract:   (5263 Views)
Introduction: Evaluation system has moved from methods evaluating the mere knowledge to those assessing capabilities and competencies. Log book is one of the common methods for evaluation of clinical skills in medical students which have been used in the clinical evaluation of midwifery students in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in recent years. So, this study aimed to determine the level of student satisfaction with this method, has been performed.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed in 2016 and 94 students of midwifery who attended obstetrics (OB) and maternal and child health (MCH) internships, were selected and have been studied. Data were collected using "measurement of satisfaction" questionnaire that included 9 domains and used likert scale. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics tests (ANOVA, Independent T test …) in SPSS 18.0 software.
Results: The mean of midwifery students' satisfaction from logbook was%47.3 ±16.9 in OB internships and% 52.8 ±15.2 in MCH internship. In MCH and OB internships, the highest satisfaction score was related to the domain of "being stressful" (%65.4 ±25.2) and (%54.3 ±27.7). In the both internships, satisfaction of last term students was more than other students. (P-value (0.05)
Conclusions: Use of Logbook in the clinical evaluation of OB and MCH internships for Midwifery students, along with relative dissatisfaction. So, revision and modification of the various aspects of Log book seems to be necessary until students are more satisfied.
Keywords: Professional Ethics, Textbooks, Nursing
Full-Text [PDF 828 kb]   (2103 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Virtual Medical Education
Received: 2017/07/15 | Accepted: 2017/09/9 | Published: 2018/04/21
References
1. Feli S, Biglari N, Pezeshki Rad G. The factor analysis of agriculture students'satisfaction about quality of educational services provided by tarbiat modares university. J Agricult Extens Educ Res. 2010;3(3):25-34.
2. Feli S, Biglari N, Pezeshki Rad G. Students'satisfaction of the quality of educational services (using servqual model) in college of agriculture, tarbiat modares. Iranian J Agricut Econom Dev Res. 2011;42-2(2):199-207.
3. Sabzevari S, Vatankhah R, Baneshi M, Jarahi L. Comparison of medical students' and teachers' perception about clinical educational environment in educational hospital wards. Future Med Educ J. 2015;5(4):41-5.
4. Yousefy A. Peer Assessment in evaluation of Medical sciences students. Iranian J Med Educ. 2012;11(9):1443-52.
5. Heidari T. The effect of Portfolio's evaluation on learning and satisfaction of midwifery students. Arak Med Univ J. 2010;12(4):81-8.
6. Pishkar Z, Navidian A, Robabi H. An assessment of traditional and objective structured practical evaluation methods on satisfaction of nursing students in Zahedan Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery: A comparing. J Med Educ Dev. 2013;7(4):2-14.
7. Farajpour A, Amini M, Pishbin E, Arshadi H, Sanjarmusavi N, Yousefi J, et al. Teachers' and Students' Satisfaction with DOPS Examination in Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, a Study in Year 2012. Iranian J Med Educ. 2014;14(2):165-73.
8. Darling-Hammond L, Amrein-Beardsley A, Haertel E, Rothstein J. Evaluating teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan. 2012;93(6):8-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209300603 [DOI:10.1177/003172171209400303]
9. Karampourian A, Khatiban M, Jahanghiri K, Razavi Z, Imani B. The effect of using logbook on emergency medical srvices student's satisfaction and clinical evaluation, in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2013. Pajouhan Sci J. 2015;13(2):50-6.
10. Movaffaghi Z, Shoeibi A, Bahari A, Khajedaluee M. The Efficiency of Medical Extern's Logbook from the Viewpoints of Externs and Faculties of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences: An Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Iranian J Med Educ. 2014;13(11):950-9.
11. Ghanbari A, Monfared A. Survey Of Clinical Evaluation Process Based On Logbook And Cognitive And Psychomotor Learning In Nursing Students. Res Med Educ. 2014;6(2):28-35. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.6.2.28]
12. Torabi K, Bazrafkan L, Sepehri S, Hashemi M. The effect of logbook as a study guide in dentistry training. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2013;1(3):81-4.
13. Heidari H, Akbari N. Developing and Implementing Log Book in Teaching Principles and Techniques to Nursing and Midwifery Students: Mixed Method Study. Future Med Educ J. 2017;7(1):14-8.
14. Mehrdad N, Bigdeli S, Ebrahimi H. A comparative study on self, peer and teacher evaluation to evaluate clinical skills of nursing students. Procd Soc Behv2012. p. 1847-52.
15. Wilkinson TJ, Frampton CM. Comprehensive undergraduate medical assessments improve prediction of clinical performance. Med Educ. 2004;38(10):1111-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01962.x] [PMID]
16. Temizer L, Turkyilmaz A. Implementation of student satisfaction index model in higher education institutions. 4th World Conference on Educational Sciences (Wces-2012)2012. p. 3802-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.150]
17. Niitsu H, Hirabayashi N, Yoshimitsu M, Mimura T, Taomoto J, Sugiyama Y, et al. Using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room. Surg Today. 2013;43(3):271-5. [DOI:10.1007/s00595-012-0313-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Amini A, Ashoori H, Ranjbar Ezatabadi M, Hadi Nodoushan H, Eslami H, Dehghani Tafti A. The Survey in Satisfaction of Students of Medical Laboratory Sciences from Educational, Research, and Welfare Services at Paramedical Faculty in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. Educ Dev Jundishapur. 2014;5(1):66-72.
19. mansoorian MR, Hosseiny M, Khosravan S, Alami A. Comparing the effects of two methods of evaluation, objective structured assessment of technical skills (osats) and traditional method, on satisfaction of students and evaluators. J Med Educ Dev. 2014;7(13):64-73.
20. Hoseini BL. Midwifery Students' Satisfaction with Logbook as a Clinical Assessment Means in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 2010. Iranian J Med Educ. 2012;11(8):933-41.
21. Asadi Lari M, Moshfeghy Z, Shahpari M, Mohammad Alian F. Midwifery Students' Satisfaction with Logbook as a Clinical Evaluation Tool in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Iranian J Med Educ. 2015;15:170-80.
22. Asgari H, Ashoorion V, Ehsanpour S. Teaching and evaluation of field training course for health services management undergraduates: conventional and logbook methods. Iranian J Med Educ. 2016;16:552-60.
23. Farsaei S. Development of a community pharmacy program in Iran with a focus on Logbook application. J Res Pharm Pract. 2016;5(1):58-62. [DOI:10.4103/2279-042X.176557] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Saremi R. Assessment of Qazvin Dental Student Satisfaction from Evaluating with Log book in periodontics Department: Qazvin university of medical science; 2016.
25. Mohammadi S, Mansourian MR, Mohammadi M, Alami A, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ferns GA. A Comparison of the Effect of Using Log Books and OSATS on the Progress of Medical Students in Anatomy Course. Brit J Med Med Res. 2017;19(11):1-6. [DOI:10.9734/BJMMR/2017/25921]
26. Hadizadeh F, Firoozi M, Shamaeyan Razavi N. Nursing and midwifery students perspective on clinical education in Gonabad University of Medical Sciences. Iranian J Med Educ. 2005;5(1):70-8.
27. Azh N. Evaluation of midwifery students in labor and delivery training: comparing two methods of logbook and checklist. Iranian J Med Educ. 2006;6(2(16)):123-8.
28. Blake K. The daily grind–use of log books and portfolios for documenting undergraduate activities. Med Educ. 2001;35(12):1097-8. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01085.x] [PMID]
29. Reulen HJ, Marz U. 5 years' experience with a structured operative training programme for neurosurgical residents. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(11):1197-203. [DOI:10.1007/s007010050237]
30. Mallappa S, Wright J, Patani N, Jethwa A, Pitkin J. Introduction of a new undergraduate medical student 'surgical log-book'to enhance future training. Int J Surg. 2013;11(8):698. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.06.595]
31. Mazareie E, Momeni Danaei S, Hosseininezhad S, Nili M. Evaluating the effect of logbook as viewed by the juniors and seniors at Shiraz school of dentistry. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2016;13(4):395-402.
32. Pournamdar Z, Salehiniya H, Shahrakipoor M. Nurse and Midwifery Students' Satisfaction of Clinical Education in Hospitals of Zahedan. Res Med Educ. 2015;7(2):45-51. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.7.2.45]
33. Moridi G, Valiee S, Khaledi S, Fathi M, Shafiean M, Gharibi F. Clinical education stressors from the perspective of students of nursing, midwifery, and operating room: a study in Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian J Med Educ. 2012;11(7):675-84.
34. Wragg A, Wade W, Fuller G, Cowan G, Mills P. Assessing the performance of specialist registrars. Clin Med (Lond). 2003;3(2):131-4. [DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine.3-2-131]
35. Omidvar S, Bakouei F, Salmalian H. Clinical education problems: the viewpoints of midwifery students in Babol Medical University. Iranian J Med Educ. 2005;5(2(14)):15-21.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Asadilari M, Moshfeghy Z, Mohammad Alian F, Shahpari M. Satisfaction of Undergraduate Midwifery Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from Clinical Evaluation using LOGBOOK. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2018; 11 (1) :22-29
URL: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-1287-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 1 (March-April 2018) Back to browse issues page
دوماهنامه علمی- پژوهشی راهبــردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی Education Strategies in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645