1. AbuSeileek AF. The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Comput Educ. 2012;58(1):231-9. [ Science Direct] 2. Augustinova M, Ferrand L. The influence of mere social presence on Strop interference: New evidence from the semantically-based Strop task. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48(5):1213-6. [ Science Direct] 3. Bishop J. Increasing participation in online communities a framework for human-computer interaction. Computer. Comput Hum Behav. 2007;23(4):1881-93. [ Science Direct] 4. Battalio J. Success in distance education: Do learning styles and multiple formats matter? Am J Distance Educ. 2009;23(1):71-87. [ File] 5. Chang Ch, Su Y. Cross-cultural interface design and the classroom-learning environment in Taiwan. Turk Online J Educ Technol. 2012;11(3):82-93. [ File] 6. Welsh ET, Wanberg CR, Brown KG, Simmering MJ. E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. Int J Train Dev. 2003;7(4):245-58. [ DOI] 7. Bielaczyc K, Collins A. Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In: Reigeluth CM, (Editor). Instructional-design theories and models. Volume 2. Boston: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2014. [ File] 8. Gagne RM, Wager WW, Goulas KC, Keler JM. Principles of instructional design. Internet High Educ. 1987;15(1):195-203. 9. Jonassen D, Davidson M, Collins M, Compbell J, Bannan Haag B. Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education. Am J Distance Educ. 1995;9(2):7-26. [ File] 10. ChanLina LJ, Chanb KCh. Group learning strategies for online course. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):397-401. [ Science Direct] 11. Molenda M. In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Perform Improv. 2003;42(5):34-6. [ DOI] 12. Davies J, Graff M. Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. Br J Edcu Technol. 2005;36(4):657-63. [ File] 13. Vass E, Littleton K, Miell D, Jones A. The discourse of collaborative creative writing: Peer collaboration as a context for mutual inspiration. Think Sk Creat. 2008;3(3):192-202. [ File] 14. McInnerney JM, Roberts RT. Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Educ Technol Soc. 2004;7(3):73-81. [ File] 15. Song L, Singleton ES, Hill JR, Hwa Koh M. Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Int High Educ. 2004;7(1):59-70. [ File] 16. Andrews L. Preparing general education pre-service teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction. J Spec Educ Technol. 2002; 17(3), 27–35. [ Homepage] 17. Bonk CJ, Dennen V. Teaching on the web: With a little help from my pedagogical friends. J Comput High Educ. 1999;11(1):3-28. [ Homepage] 18. Lee K. Online collaborative case study learning. J Coll Read Learn. 2007;37(2):82-100. [ File] 19. FitzPatrick Th. Key success factors of eLearning in education: A professional development model to evaluate and support eLearning. US-China Educ Rev. 2012;9(1):789-95. [ File] 20. Glava CC, Glava AE. Time management on the on-line learning platforms. A case study regarding the BSCW platform used by future teacher student. Soc Behav Sci. 2012;46(1):3551-5. [ File] 21. Rourke L, Anderson T. Using web-based, group communication systems to support case study learning at a distance. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2002;3(2):1-13. [ Homepage] 22. Wise A, Chang J, Duffy TM, Del Valle R. The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. J Educ Comput Res. 2004;31(3):247-71. [ Homepage] 23. Nicoll K, Harrison R. Constructing the good teacher in higher education: The discursive work of standards. Stud Contin Educ. 2010;25(1):23-35. [ DOI] 24. Graham M, Scarborough H. Enhancing the learning environment for distance education students. Distance Educ. 2001;22(2):232-44. [ DOI] 25. Swan K, Shih LF. On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. J Asynchronous Learn Netw. 2005;9(3):115-36. [ File] |
