1. Ebrahimi M. Behrooznia S. Fasting: Benefits and Probable Health Harmfulness from the Islamic Perspective. J Fasting Health. 2015;3(2):50-3. [ Homepage] 2. Majdzadeh R, Nedjat S, Keshavarz H, Rashidian A, Eynollahi B, Larijani B, et al. A new experience in medical student admission in Iran. Iran J Publ Health. 2009;38(1):36-9. [ Homepage] 3. Rahbar darshekasteh H. Evaluation in education. J Growth Teach. 2001;157:66-9. [Persian] [ Homepage] 4. Seraji F, Attaran M. E-learning (principles, designing, implementation and evaluation). 2nd edition. Hamedan: Bu Ali Sina University; 2012. pp. 78-82. [Persian] [ Homepage] 5. Razeghi T, Seraji F. The important challenges for the evaluation of student learning in higher education in Iran. Iran, Tehran: 2nd National Conference on Evaluation and Quality Assurance in Education with a Focus on the Integration of the Educational System; 2013, 1 Mar. [Persian] [ Homepage] 6. Razeghi T. Indentification challeges related to evaluation method of students learning in Bu-Ali Sina University [Dissertation]. Hamadan: Bu-Ali Sina University; 2012. pp. 5-188. [Persian] [ Homepage] 7. Leung SF, Mok E, Wong D. The impact of assessment methods on the learning of nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(6):711-9. [ PubMed] 8. Saif AA, Fathabadi J. Different approaches to lesson study and the relationship of study skills with academic achievement, gender and educational experience of university students. Daneshvar Raftar. 2009;15(33):29-40. [Persian] [ Homepage] 9. Roshanaei M. The Relationship between learning approaches and preferences for instructional methods. Q J Res Plan Higher Educ. 2007;13(3):109-42. [Persian] [ Homepage] 10. Gijbels D, Segers M, Struyf E. Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instr Sci. 2008;36(5-6):431-43. [ Homepage] 11. Diseth A, Martinsen O. Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educ Psychol. 2003;23(2):195-207. [ Homepage] 12. Haghjooy Javanmard S, Mansourian M. Factors affecting deliberate learning in first year students of nursing and midwifery school of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;10(5):675-82. [Persian] [ Homepage] 13. Moulaert V, Verwijnen MG, Rikers R, Scherpbier AJ. The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2004;38(10):1044-52. [ PubMed] 14. Ericsson KA. The scientific study of expert levels of performance: General implications for optimal learning and creativity. High Ability Stud. 1998;9(1):75-100. [ DOI] 15. Bourbonnais FF, Langford S, Giannantonio L. Development of a clinical assessment tool for baccalaureate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2008;8(1):62-71. [ PubMed] 16. Abbas Zadeh A, Borhani F, Sabzevari S, Eftekhari Z. The assessment methods and its relationship to learning approaches of nursing students in Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2013;10(2):260-70. [Persian] [ Homepage] 17. Abdi H, Nilli MR. The Relationship between course experience and deliberate practice study approach among nursing students. Iran J Med Educ. 2014;14(9):758-66. [Persian] [ Homepage] 18. Mahmoodi MR. Validation of studying and Learning Approaches Questionnaire to identify students’ studying and learning methods. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2014;10(4):421-30. [Persian] [ Homepage] 19. Dlouhá J, Burandt S. Design and evaluation of learning processes in an international sustainability oriented study programme. In search of a new educational quality and assessment method. J Cleaner Product. 2015;106:247-58. [ Science Direct] 20. Grift W, Helms Lorenz M, Maulana R. Teaching skills of student teachers: Calibration of an evaluation instrument and its value in predicting student academic engagement. Stud Educ Eval. 2014;43:150-9. [ Science Direct] 21. Klimova BF. Evaluation Methods as an effective tool for the development of students’ learning. Procedia. 2014;152:112-5. [ Science Direct] 22. Ebrahimi Z. Study strengths and weaknesses of undergraduate university students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' progress evaluation practices of teachers and students [Dissertation]. Isfahan: Isfahan University; 2012. [Persian] [ Homepage] 23. Fath Abadi J, Rezaei A. Examining the effects of descriptive-qualitative evaluation approach in achieving cognitive, affective and psycho- motor educational objectives at primary schools. J Manag Plann Educ Sys. 2009;(2)3:31-52. [Persian] [ Homepage] 24. Dehghani Poudeh M, Shams B, Ashourioun V, Esmaeilee A, Asilian A, Nasri P, et al. Internal assessment of Isfahan general medicine curriculum based on basic standards of Ministry of Health and Medical Education. A Model for evaluation and analysis of results. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;10(5):552-65. [Persian] [ Homepage] 25. Sabzevari S, Abbaszadeh A, Borhani F. Perception of nursing faculties from clinical assessment challenges in students: A qualitative study. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2013;10(3):385-97. [Persian] [ Homepage] 26. Alavi M, Irajpour A. Optimum characteristics of nursing students’ clinical evaluation: Clinical nursing teachers’ viewpoints in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2014;13(10):796-808. [Persian] [ Homepage] 27. Levin A, Sun CJ. Barriers With in the Academy. J Internet Higher Educ. 2003;(4):34-45. [ Homepage] 28. Suen HK, Wu Q. Psychometric paradox of very high-stakes assessment and solutions. J Educ Policy. 2006;3(1):113. [ Homepage] 29. Tarant S. The evaluation of a collaborative teaching team in higher education. J Acc Educ. 2008;16(3-4):120-35. [ Homepage] 30. Marsh H, Roche LA. Making students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. Am Psychol Assoc. 1997;52(11):1187-97. [ Homepage] 31. Keshtiarray N, Karimi Alavijeh A, Foroughi Abari AA. Identifying the barriers and challenges in performing the descriptive evaluation plan. Res Curriculum Plann Q J Sci Res. 2014;10(12):53-68. [Persian] [ Homepage] 32. Sepasi H. Check formative assessment on student progress. J Soc Sci Hum Univ Shiraz. 2004;20(1):1-10. [Persian] [ Homepage] 33. Heidari F, Ahmdi Gh. Identifying problems and offering solutions a curriculum to meet the Curriculum evaluation process. Res Curriculum Plann Q J Sci Res. 2013;10(9):126-36. [Persian] [ Homepage] 34. Gollickson N. Assessment and classroom learning, assessment in education: Principles policy and practice. Educ Res. 1967;5(1):73-7. 35. Shakila T, Amos R. Synthesis of research on classroom management. J Educ Leader. 1983;83(4):342-7. [ Homepage] 36. Bostton C. The concept of formative assessment. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2002;8(9). Available from: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=9 [ Homepage] 37. Shareefiaan F, Nasr AR, Aabedee L. Exemplary professors\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' approach to academic evaluation and the extent of its use by other faculty members. Q J New Thoughts Educ. 2009;5(1):9-34. [Persian] [ Homepage] 38. Diseth A. Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Stud Higher Educ. 2007;32(3):373-88. [ DOI] 39. McKee G, Costello P, Adams A, Porter M. The Use of a Supplementary Online Learning Course, and its Effect on Academic Achievement within an Undergraduate Nursing Programme. Irland J Teach Learn Higher Educ. 2010;2(1):1-15. [ Homepage] 40. Gulikers JTM, Bastiaens TJ, Kirschner PA, Kester L. Relations between student perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approaches and learning outcome. Stud Educ Eval. 2006;32(4):381-400. [ Science Direct] |
