[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Principles of Transparency::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 2 (May-Jun 2016) ::
Educ Strategy Med Sci 2016, 9(2): 97-105 Back to browse issues page
The effect of education management based on strategies of educational neuroscience on student’ learning improvement
Zeinab Sadeghi 1, Mohammadreza Behrangi2 , Bijan Abdollahi2 , Hasanreza Zeinabadi2
1- Department of educational administration, Faculty of management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran , zeinab_sadeghi1291@yahoo.com
2- Department of educational administration, Faculty of management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (9119 Views)

Aims: Different education methods play crucial roles on student’ learning improvement, and dealing with new and novel concepts is an important aspect in managing education & teaching. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of education management based on educational neuroscience on student’ learning improvement.

Methods: In this quasi-experimental with pre-test, post-test design and a control group study, two classes consist of 30 students from faculty of management in Kharazmi university were participated as a sample in access. Of these, classes of 15 students were selected as a control group and 15 students as an experimental group. Control group was instructed through traditional method of teaching human resource management (HRM) and quasi-experimental group was instructed through strategies of educational neuroscience used in a scenario made for teaching the same content of HRM. Data was collected by Teacher made essay test in HRM learning improvement were used for pre-test and post-test that confirmed their validity and reliability.  Descriptive statistics and ANCOVA were used to analyze the data.

Finding: findings indicated that there is significant difference between the two groups, in the post- test of HRM learning improvement (p≤0.01). The results showed high significant impact of  the strategies of educational neuroscience ten steps in teaching HRM on student’ learning improvement in the experimental group.

Conclusion: This result reflected the success of the strategies of educational neuroscience compared with traditional teaching methods and was a scientific evidence to recommend the use of this model in teaching.

Keywords: education management, of educational neuroscience, learning improvement, students
Full-Text [PDF 1136 kb]   (5244 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: New Methods of Teaching in Medical Sciences
Received: 2016/06/30 | Accepted: 2016/08/29 | Published: 2016/08/29
References
1. Fischer, KW, Bernstein GH, and Immordino, M.H. Mind, Brain, and Education in reading disorders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2006 [Homepage]
2. Varma S, McCandliss BD, Schwartz DL. Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher. 2008; 37(3):140-52. [Homepage]
3. Hall J. Neuroscience and education: What can brain science contribute to teaching and learning? The SCRE Centre, University of Glasgow. 2005. [cited 2013 June 20]. Available from: http://www.preonline.co.uk/ feature_pdfs/ spotlight 92.pdf [Homepage] [File]
4. Blakemore S-J & Frith U. The learning Brain: lessons for education. Developmental science. 2005; 8(6). 459-471. [File]
5. Frith U. Teaching in 2020: The impact of neuroscience. Journal of Education for Teaching. 2005; 31(4):289–91.
6. Jensen EP. Brain-based learning: A reality check. Educational leadership. 2000; 57(7): 76-80. [Homepage]
7. Jensen EP. A fresh look at brain- based education. Phi Delta Kappan. 2008; 89(6): 409. [Homepage]
8. Bransford, J, Brown AL, Cocking RR. Mind and brain. In K W Fischer & M H Immordino-Yang(Eds). The Jossey- Bass Reader on brain and learning. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass. 2008. pp: 89-103. [Homepage]
9. Sylwester, R. Alphabetized entries from how to explain a brain. In K W Fischer & M H Immordino-Yang(Eds). The Jossey- Bass Reader on brain and learning. San Francisco, California: 2008. Jossey-Bass.pp: 20-30.
10. Amaro EJr, Barker GJ. Study design in fMRI: Basic principles. Brain Cognition. 2006; 60: 220–32. [Homepage]
11. Seif, Ali Akbar. Methods of learning & reading. Tehran: doran. 2009.
12. Sadeghi Z. Designing the education management conceptual framework within pyramid of categories, concepts, and attributes in educational neuroscience. 2016. [Persian] [Homepage]
13. King, A., &Eshnaider, B. The First Global Revolution. (Translated by Kharazmi, Sh. 1996). Tehran: Ehya publications. 1990. [Homepage]
14. Heidari T, Kariman N, Heidari Z, Amiri farahani L. Comparison effect of feedback lecture and conventional lecture method on learning and quality of teaching. Arak Med Univ J. 2010;12(4):34-43. [Persian]
15. Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE guide no.65. Med Teach. 2012; 34(5):e275-87. [File]
16. Majidiani, M. The effectiveness of teaching methods in academic achievement of students in the fifth grade science class Zivieh Kurdistan region. Islamic Azad University. 2009.
17. Houff, S., Klinger, M.B. & Coffman, T. Using Brain-Based Learning Strategies in the Classroom. In. Jan Herrington et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2013. Chesapeake, VA: AACE2005. 2013. pp. 2060-2069 [cited 2014 November 30]. Available from: http://www.editlib.org [Homepage]
18. Awolola, Samuel Adejare. Effect of brain-based learning strategy on students’ achievement in senior secondary school mathematics in Oyo State, Nigeria. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. 2011; 6(2)[cited 2014 November 30]. Available from: http://world-education-center.org/index.php/cjes/article/viewArticle/242 [Homepage]
19. Murray B, Kaniasty K, Robertson DU. the combined and differential roles of working memory mechanisms in academic achievement. Pennsylvania: Indiana University of Pennsylvania. 2010
20. Tufeski, S, Demirel M. The effect of brain based learning on achievement, retention, attitude and learning process. Procedia social and behavioral science. 1: 1782-1791.
21. 2Ozden, M, Gultekin M. The effects of brain- based learning on academic achievement and retention of knowledge in science course. Electronic journal of science education. 2008; 12(1): 1-17.
22. Sadeghi Z, Behrangi MR, Mohtashami R. Comparison effects of Managing Education Strategy on self-directed learning in morning report subject in medical students. Educational Development of Jundishapur. 2016; 7(2): 138-145
23. Behrangi, M.R, Taghipour Khalflou, A. The Effect of the Model of Managing Education of the Organizational Learning Theory Dimensions on Empowerment of High School Students, Managing education in organization. 2012; 1(1): 105-34. [Persian].
24. Munro BH: Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. P. 105.
25. Behrangi M, Simin H. Research Based Theory of Overhauling Science Education Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 167:229-237.
26. Behrangi M. Study of Education management teaching model in term of creativity in learning and learning of creativity. Third national creativity conference, RIZ & innovation engineering and management in Iran. Tehran, Creativity Sciences institute. Innovation and treas.2010 [Persian].Engaged learning through the use of brain-based teaching: A case study of eight middle school classroom. phD dissertation: Northern Illinois university. 2007
27. Behrangi, Mohammadreza. Aghayari, tayyebeh. The evolution resulted from partnership Model of jigsaw in traditional state of teaching for elementary students, educational innovations journal. 2004; 3(10): 35-54. [Persian]
28. 2Burkett, Laura B. Brain-based learning: A study on how teachers implement strategies in the traditional classroom. Ph.D. theses. 2014 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 195 pages. [Cited 2014 November 30]. Available from: http://gateway.proquest.com/ openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri: pqdiss&rft_val_fmt= info:ofi/ fmt:kev: mtx: dissertation&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3632931 [Homepage]
29. Weimer, C. Engaged learning through the use of brain- based teaching: A case study of eight middle school classroom. phD dissertation: Northern Illinois university. 2007 [Homepage]
30. Duman, B. The effect of brain- based instruction to improve on students’ academic achievement in social studies instruction. 9th international conference on engineering education. July 2006; 23(28):17-25. [Homepage]
31. Zohoor A, Eslaminejad T. Teacher's effective teaching criteria as viewed by the students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. J Med Educ. 2004; 4(2):65-70. [Homepage]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sadeghi Z, Behrangi M, Abdollahi B, Zeinabadi H. The effect of education management based on strategies of educational neuroscience on student’ learning improvement . Educ Strategy Med Sci 2016; 9 (2) :97-105
URL: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-1020-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 2 (May-Jun 2016) Back to browse issues page
دوماهنامه علمی- پژوهشی راهبــردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی Education Strategies in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 35 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660