[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 14, Issue 3 (7-2021) ::
Educ Strategy Med Sci 2021, 14(3): 92-102 Back to browse issues page
A Review of New Methods Assessment in Clinical Education of Medical Science Students
Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam1 , Elnaz Yazdanparast2 , Seyede Faezeh Hosseiny3 , Hadi Ahmadi Chenari 4
1- Tehran University of Medical Scien
2- Birjand University of Medical Scien
3- Iran University of Medical Scien
4- Birjand University of Medical Sciences , ahmadi.h@bums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (417 Views)
Introduction: Clinical education is an important part of education in medical sciences. One of the most important barriers to clinical education is the problems with the evaluation system. Studies with controversial results have been conducted in the field of clinical evaluation methods. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the research done to determine the appropriate clinical evaluation method.
Methods: This study is a systematic review and the searches were done in Iran doc, Health.barakat, SID, MedLib databases between 2010 – 2019, as well as in ISI, PubMed, Elsevier, Science Direct, Ovid, Pro Quest, and Google Scholar databases from 2010 to 2019. “Clinical Evalution”, “New Evalution”, “Medical Science Students”, “Performance Evalution”, and their Persian equivalent keywords were used. Finally, 13 studies that had the criteria for entering this study were selected and reviewed.
Results: The results of the collective studies showed that each of the evaluation methods has advantages and disadvantages, including the 360 degree evaluation method, can be helpful in improving student dissatisfaction. Comparing the portfolio with the log book, the most important difference between them is that the portfolio includes student critical thinking. The observation of direct performance allows feedback and evaluation without much financial and human resources. One of the disadvantages of a long case is that its validity and reliability is low.
Conclusion: In a method of evaluating, the validity, reliability, applicability and positive feedback of this method on the trainee are important. Also, given that the clinical capability has a completely complex structure, for its valid evaluation, we need multiple and combined methods and use of any method is depends on the purpose of the evaluation.
Keywords: Clinical Evalution, New Evalution, Medical Sciences Students, Performance Evalution
Full-Text [PDF 572 kb]   (174 Downloads)    
Article Type: Systematic Review | Subject: Evaluation Methods in Medical Sciences
Received: 2019/11/11 | Accepted: 2020/01/12 | Published: 2021/07/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zakerimoghadam M, Yazdanparast E, Hosseiny S F, Ahmadi Chenari H. A Review of New Methods Assessment in Clinical Education of Medical Science Students. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2021; 14 (3) :92-102
URL: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-2414-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 3 (7-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوماهنامه علمی- پژوهشی راهبــردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی Education Strategies in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4331