[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Principles of Transparency::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 8, Issue 3 (July-August 2015) ::
Educ Strategy Med Sci 2015, 8(3): 137-143 Back to browse issues page
Creativity Analysis in Faculties of Biomedical Courses According to Torrance Creativity Theory Iran University of Medical Sciences
Babaei Osalou H1 , Sohrabi Z 2, Khajehazad M
1- Midwifery Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Medical Education Department, Medicine Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , zosohrabi@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (15549 Views)

Aims: Teaching creativity to students need the creative teachers with high levels of class leadership who is able to use different methods of teaching to develop the creativity in students. The aim of this study was to evaluate the status of creativity in Medical Faculty of Iran University of Medical Sciences’ basic sciences professors was based on the Torrance theory.
 Instrument & Methods: In this correlational study in the second semester of the 2013-14 academic year, 60 faculty members of Iran University of Medical Sciences were entered the study by census method. The research instrument was the standard Torrance creativity questionnaire. Using SPSS 16 software, the data were analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient, Levene, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Findings: There was no “very low” creativity, but 10 professors (16.7%), had low, 17 (28.3%) had average, 24 (40.0%) had high and 9 (15.0%) had very high creativity level. Total mean of creativity was 85.23±1.52 and was 23.25±0.52 for rigidity, 22.55±0.43 for flexibility, 20.67±0.45 for extension and 19.15±0.50 for innovation (p<0.0001). The creativity of faculties had inverse relation with age (r=-0.257 p=0.047) and teaching experience (r=-0.322 p=0.015).
Conclusion: Creativity level of basic biomedical courses’ faculties in the medicine faculty of Iran University of Medical Sciences is assessed as “high”.

Keywords: Torrance Theory , Creativity [MeSH], Faculty Medical [MeSH], Biomedical Research [MeSH]
Full-Text [PDF 495 kb]   (2591 Downloads)    
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey | Subject: Evaluation Methods in Medical Sciences
Received: 2014/11/2 | Accepted: 2015/05/18 | Published: 2015/06/1
References
1. Behroozi N. The Necessity of Raising Creativity in Advanced Education. J Eng Educ. 2007;29(8):81-95. [Persian] [Homepage]
2. Afshar Kohan Z, Asareh AR. Effect of creativity training to teachers on student creativity province\\\\\\\'s first-grade school year 2009-10. Initiat Creat Hum Sci. 2012;1(2):29-55. [Persian] [Homepage]
3. Ghahraman Tabrizi K, Tondnevis F, Amirtash AM, Kadivar P. The relationship between organizational culture and the creativity of physical education department’s faculty of Iran’s governmental universities. Motor Sport. 2005;3(6):139-50. [Persian] [Homepage]
4. Pirkhaefi A. Creativity: Principles and methods. Tehran: Ghoghnoos; 2006. [Persian] [Homepage]
5. Seif AA. Modern educational psychology: Psychology of learning and teaching. Tehran: Doran; 2011. [Persian] [Homepage]
6. Kyung Hwa L. The relationship between creative thinking ability and creative personality of preschoolers. Int Educ J. 2005;6(2)194-99. [Homepage]
7. Sam Khanian MR, Jahanian R, Mortezai A, Sam Khanian M. Creativity and innovation in education organization. Tehran: Espand Honar; 2008. [Persian] [Homepage]
8. Parker J. The impact of visual art instruction on student creativity [Dissertation]. Naples, FL. Walden University; 2008. [Homepage]
9. Mirkamali SM. Creative thinking and its fertility in educational organizations. Psychol Educ. 1999;4(2):99-120. [Persian] [Homepage]
10. Pisanu F, Menapace P. Creativity & Innovation: Four Key Issues from a Literature Review. Creat Educ. 2014;5(3):145-54. [Homepage]
11. Hosseini M, Sadeghi T. Effective factors on faculty members’ creativity and innovation and presenting strategy for promotion. Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2010;3(1):1-6. [Persian] [Homepage]
12. Shoghi B, Mortezavi SM. Individual and organizational creativity [concepts, definitions and theories]. Tehran: Raze Nahan; 2012. [Persian] [Homepage]
13. Teresa AM, Schatzel EA, Moneta GB, Kramer SJ. Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadersh Q. 2004;15(1):5-32. [Homepage]
14. Dau Gaspar O. The teachers’ creative attitudes: An influence factor of the students’ creative attitudes. Florence, Italy: International Conference on the Future of Education. 2011. [File]
15. Ibrakovid V, Bognar B. Creativity in teaching plant production. Educ J Living Theories. 2009;2(2):232-45. [Homepage]
16. Jaussi KS, Dionne SD. Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior. Leadersh Q. 2003;14(4-5):475-98. [Science Direct]
17. Martin NK, Nancy K, Yin Z. Attitudes and beliefs regarding classroom management style: Differences between male and female teachers. Res Sch. 2003;10(2):29-43. [Homepage]
18. Jauk E, Benedek M, Dunst B, Neubauer AC. The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence. 2013;41(4):212-21. [PubMed]
19. Rezaei S, Manochehri M. Reliability, validity and standardization Torrance test of creative teachers in secondary schools in Tehran. J Psychol Educ Sci. 2009;38(3):46-68. [Persian] [Homepage]
20. Fakhrerahimi S, Dehqan A, Bakhshani N. Causes of speech disorders in primary school students of Zahedan. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2013;15(2):79-82. [File]
21. Alizadeh Gh, Salimi Gh. The Relation between Organizational Culture and Improvement in the Quality of Secondary School Performance in Isfahan. Knowl Res Educ Sci. 2007;4(14):43-70. [Persian] [Homepage]
22. Rice G. Individual values, organizational context, and self-perceptions of employee creativity: Evidence from Egyptian organizations. J Business Res. 2006;59(2):233-41. [Science Direct]
23. Tajali SA, Safania AM, Moosavi SJ. The relationship between organizational culture and creativity in physical education experts in university of Applied Science and Technology. Int J Sport Stud. 2013;3(11):1237-45. [Homepage]
24. Hon AHY, Shaping environments conductive to creativity: The role of intrinsic motivation. Cornell Hosp Q. 2012;53(1):53-64. [Homepage]
25. Ziapour A, Khatony A, Kianipour N, Jafary F. Identification and analysis of labor productivity components based on ACHIEVE model (Case study: Staff of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences). Glob J Health Sci. 2014;7(1):315-21. [PubMed]
26. Mohammadi M, Esfandnia A, Fathinia R, Mohammadi E, Rezaei S. Examine the relationship between organizational trust and organizational innovation. Spectrum. 2014;3(9):276-83. [Homepage]
27. Shaterani S, Gheytasi Zadeh F, Goodarzi F. An examination of the intermediary role of creativity in the relation between knowledge management and faculty members (Case Study: Tehran\\\\\\\'s Azad University\\\\\\\'s units, Iran). J Educ Manage Stud. 2015;5(1):27-33. [File]
28. Hogan SJ, Coote LV. Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein\\\\\\\'s model. J Business Res. 2014;67(8):1609-21. [Homepage]
29. Auernhammer J, Hall H. Organizational culture in knowledge creation, creativity and innovation: Towards the Freiraum model. J Info Sci. 2013;11(1):1-14. [File]
30. Naranjo Valencia JC, Jimenez Jimenez D, Sanz Valle R. Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Manag Decis. 2011;49(1):55-72. [DOI]
31. Jung DI. Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in group. Creat Res J. 2001;13(2):185-95. [DOI]
32. Gumusluoglu L. Ilsv A. Transformational leadership, creativity and organizational innovation. J Business Res. 2009;62(4):461-73. [Science Direct]
33. Burton C. The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Educ Manag. 2001;13(2):9-24. [Homepage]
34. Mora JG, Villarreal E. Breaking down structural barriers to innovation in traditional universities. Higher Educ Manag. 2001;13(2):57-66. [File]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Babaei Osalou H, Sohrabi Z, Khajehazad M. Creativity Analysis in Faculties of Biomedical Courses According to Torrance Creativity Theory Iran University of Medical Sciences. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2015; 8 (3) :137-143
URL: http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-735-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 3 (July-August 2015) Back to browse issues page
دوماهنامه علمی- پژوهشی راهبــردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی Education Strategies in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660